0
Administrative Law Anthology, 1994 - Thomas O. Sargentich
اسم الكتاب - Administrative Law Anthology, 1994
المؤلف - Thomas O. Sargentich
الناشر - Anderson Publishing
الطبعة - N/A
مكان النشر - UK
سنه النشر - 1994
كلمات دليلية -
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW UNITED STATES REGULATORY
المقدمة الخاصة بالكتاب -
The field of Administrative Law is engaged in a broad range of debates about fundamental premises, including controversies about how to interpret statutes, how much deference a court should give to an agency's interpretation of a statute, what values should be stressed in the doctrine of procedural due process, and the appropriate relationships of agencies with courts, Congress, and the President. The Administrative Law Anthology provides perspectives on doctrine that are difficult to gain from the cases alone. Each section has a short introduction summarizing the excerpts. In a basic course, student understanding of cases is enriched by reading the first two excerpts in a section, which generally present competing views. Additional readings provide material for those seeking to go more deeply into particular subjects. Each section also has a bibliography.
الفهرس الخاص بالكتاب كاملا -
Preface xi
PART I Major Controversies Implicating the Dominant Rule of Law Vision of Administrative Legitimacy 1
A. Controversies About Substantive Legal Limits on Agencies 1
1. The Debate About Reviving the Delegation Doctrine 1
Theodore J. Lowi, Two Roads to Serfdom: Liberalism, Conservatism and Administrative Power, 36 AM. U. L. REV. 295 (1987) 3
Richard B. Stewart, Beyond Delegation Doctrine, 36 AM. U. L. REV. 323 (1987) 9
Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Delegation Debate and Competing Ideals of the Administrative Process, 36 AM. U. L REV. 419 (1987) 14
Jerry L. Mashaw, Prodelegation: Why Administrators Should Make Political Decisions,1 J. LAW. ECON. & ORGAN. 81 (1985) 20
Additional Sources 27
2. Debates About the Interpretation of Statutory Authorizations of Agencies 28
a. Statutory Interpretation in General 28
William N. Eskridge, Jr., Dynamic Statutory Interpretation, 135 U. PA. L. REV., 1479 (1987) 29
Nicholas S. Zeppos, Judicial Candor and Statutory Interpretation, 78 GEO. L.J. 353 (1989) 36
Cass R. Sunstein, Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 HARV. L. REV. 405 (1989) 42
Stephen Breyer, On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 845 (1992) 44
Additional Sources 53
b. Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations 55
Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 VAND. L. REV. 301 (1988) 56
Thomas W. Merrill, Judicial Deference to Executive Precedent, 101 YALE L.J. 969 (1992) 59
Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, 1989 DUKE L.J. 511 69
Cynthia R. Farina, Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State, 89 COLUM. L. REV. 452 (1989) 71
Additional Sources 80
B. Controversies About Procedural Legal Limits on Agencies 81
1. Debates About Procedural Due Process 81
Edward L. Rubin, Due Process and the Administrative State, 72 CAL. L. REV. 1044 (1984) 82
Jerry L. Mashaw, The Supreme Court's Due Process Calculus for Administrative Adjudication in Mathews v. Eldridge: Three Factors in Search of a Theory of Value, 44 U. CHI. L. REV. 28 (1976) 97
Cynthia R. Farina, Conceiving Due Process, 3 YALE J.L. & FEMINISM 189 (1991) 108
Additional Sources 128
2. The Debate About Nonlegislative Rule Exemptions to Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Procedures 130
Robert A. Anthony, Interpretive Rules, Policy Statements, Guidances, Manuals, and the Like - Should Federal Agencies Use Them to Bind the Public?, 41 DUKE L.J. 1311 (1992) 131
Peter L. Strauss, The Rulemaking Continuum, 41 DUKE L.J. 1463 (1992) 137
Michael Asimow, Nonlegislative Rulemaking and Regulatory Reform, 1985 DUKE L.J. 381 142
Additional Sources 149
3. The Debate About Alternative Dispute Resolution In Administrative Procedure 150
Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 GEO. L.J. 1 (1982) 151
William Funk, When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Regulatory Negotiation and the Public Interest - EPA's Woodstove Standards, 18 ENVTL. L. 55 (1987) 153
Philip J. Harter, Points on a Continuum: Dispute Resolution Procedures and the Administrative Process, 1 ADMIN. L.J. 141 (1987) 159
Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 YALE L.J. 1073 (1984) 161
Additional Sources 164
PART II Major Controversies Implicating Other Visions of Administrative Legitimacy 165
A. Controversies About the Instrumental Rationality of Administration In the Pursuit of Public Values 165
1. The Debate About Comprehensive Regulatory Analysis 165
Thomas 0. McGarity, Regulatory Analysis and Regulatory Reform, 65 TEX L. REV. 1243 (1987) 166
Steven Kelman, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique, REGULATION 33 (Jan./Feb. 1981) 177
Additional Sources 183
2. The Debate About Judicial Assessment of the Rationality of Agency Decisionmaking: Hard-Look Review 184
Merrick B. Garland, Deregulation and Judicial Review, 98 HARV. L. REV. 505 (1985) 185
Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 ADMIN. L. REV. 363 (1986) 195
Sidney A. Shapiro and Richard E. Levy, Heightened Scrutiny of the Fourth Branch: Separation of Powers and the Requirement of Adequate Reasons for Agency Decisions, 1987 DUKE L.J. 387 200
Additional Sources 208
B. Controversies About the Openness and Political Oversight of Administration In the Pursuit of a More Democratic Process 209
1. Debates About Openness In Government: Freedom of Information 209
Antonin Scalia, The Freedom of Information Act Has No Clothes, REGULATION 15 (March/April 1982) 210
Patricia M. Wald, The Freedom of Information Act: A Short Case Study in the Perils and Paybacks of Legislating Democratic Values, 33 EMORY L.J. 649 (1984) 211
Robert G. Vaughn, Federal Information Policy and Administrative Law, in HANDBOOK ON REGULATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 467 (David Rosenbloom & Richard Schwartz eds., 1994) 216
Additional Sources 227
2. Debates About the Supervision of Agencies by Congress 227
a. The Legislative Veto of Administrative Action 227
Harold H. Bruff and Ernest Gellhorn, Congressional Control of Administrative Regulation: A Study of Legislative Vetoes, 90 HARV. L. REV. 1369 (1977) 228
E. Donald Elliott, INS v. Chadha: The Administrative Constitution, the Constitution, and the Legislative Veto, 1983 SUP. CT. REV. 125 234
Stephen Breyer, The Legislative Veto After Chadha, 72 GEO. L.J. 785 (1984) 241
Additional Sources 243
b. Congressional Oversight of Administrative Action 245
James B. Pearson, Oversight: A Vital Yet Neglected Congressional Function, 23 KAN. L. REV. 277 (1975) 246
Peter M. Shane, Legal Disagreement and Negotiation in a Government of Laws: The Case of Executive Privilege Claims Against Congress, 71 MINN. L. REV. 461 (1987) 247
Additional Sources 261
3. The Debate About the Supervision of Agency Rulemaking by the President 262
Harold H. Bruff, Presidential Management of Agency Rulemaking, 57 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 533 (1989) 263
Alan B. Morrison, OMB Interference with Agency Rulemaking: The Wrong Way to Write a Regulation, 99 HARV. L, REV. 1059 (1986) 269
Peter L. Strauss and Cass R. Sunstein, The Role of the President and OMB in Informal Rulemaking, 38 ADMIN. L. REV. 181 (1986) 271
Charles Tiefer, The Quayle Council: "No Fingerprints" on Regulation, in THE SEMI-SOVEREIGN PRESIDENCY: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S STRATEGY FOR GOVERNING WITHOUT CONGRESS 61 (1994) 274
Additional Sources 279
4. Debates About the Constitutional System of the Separation of Powers 281
a. The Constitutional Position of Administrative Agencies 281
Geoffrey P. Miller, Independent Agencies, 1986 SUP. CT. REV. 41 282
Peter M. Shane, Independent Policy making and Presidential Power: A Constitutional Analysis, 57 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 596 (1989) 296
Peter L. Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 COLUMN. L. REV. 573 (1984) 300
Additional Sources 311
b. The Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers 313
Lloyd N. Cutler, To Form a Government, in SEPARATION OF POWERS: DOES IT STILL WORK? 1 (Robert A. Goldwin & Art Kaufman eds., 1986) 314
Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Limits of the Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers, 34 WM. & MARY L. REV. 679 (1993) 321
Addtional Sources 334
Part III Other Major Controversies About the Role of Courts Implicating Competing Visions of Administrative Legitimacy 335
A. The Controversy About the Reviewability of Agency Decisionmaking 335
Ronald M. Levin, Understanding Unreviewability in Administrative Law, 74 MINN. L. REV. 689 (1990) 336
Additional Sources 344
B. The Controversy About the Plaintiff's Standing to Sue an Agency 345
Antonin Scalia, The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers, 17 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 881 (1983) 347
Cass R. Sunstein, What's Standing After Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, "Injuries," and Article ///, 91 MICH. L. REV. 163 (1992) 349
William A. Fletcher, The Structure of Standing, 98 YALE L.J. 221 (1988) 360
Gene R. Nichol, Jr., Rethinking Standing, 72 CAL. L. REV. 68 (1984) 363
Additional Sources 366
C. The Controversy About Agency Nonacquiescence to Judicial Rulings 367
Samuel Estreicher and Richard L. Revesz, Nonacquiescence by Federal Administrative Agencies, 98 YALE L.J. 679 (1989) 368
Matthew Diller and Nancy Morawetz, Intracircuit Nonacquiescence and the Breakdown of the Rule of Law, A Response to Estreicher and Revesz, 99 YALE L.J. 801 (1990) 377
Additional Sources 381
D. The General Controversy About the Role of Courts In Administrative Law 382
Keith Werhan, The Neoclassical Revival in Administrative Law, 44 ADMIN. L. REV. 567 (1992) 383
R. Shep Melnick, Administrative Law and Bureaucratic Reality, 44 ADMIN. L. REV. 245 (1992) 392
Additional Sources 396
Part IV Competing Theoretical Perspectives on the Administrative Process 397
George J. Stigler, The Theory of Economic Regulation, 2 BELL J. OF ECON. & MGMT. SCI. 3 (1971) 399
Mark Seidenfeld, A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State, 105 HARV. L. REV. 1511 (1992) 404
Gerald E. Frug, The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law, 97 HARV. L. REV. 1276 (1984) 412
Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Reform of the American Administrative Process: The Contemporary Debate, 1984 WIS. L. REV. 385 432
Additional Sources 450
المواضيع المتشابهه:
المفضلات